Legal Opinion

Shepard & Playford v. John G. Allen & Son

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Osage Bistriot Court. Allen & Son, as plaintiffs, recovered judgment against Shepard & Playford, at the April Term 1874, for $952.25, and costs. The defendants bring the case here on error. The facts and proceedings are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*183The .opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by John G. Allen & Son against Shepard & Playford, on an account for goods sold and delivered. The judgment below was for the plaintiffs, and the defendants below, who are now plaintiffs in error, brought the case to this court. • The only assignments of error are as follows:

“First, That the said court erred in admitting the evidence on the part of the said Allen & Son, to which the said Shepard & Playford at the time objected.
“Second, That the said judgment was given for the said Allen & Son when it ought to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kermeyer v. NewbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Cooper v. CondonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. McCoy v. HazlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William M. Graham Oil & Gas Co. v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Meek v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Medberry, Yetter & Co. v. Soper, Brainard & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Brown-Crummer Investment Co. v. Bankers Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. State v. HeaderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API