Balkema v. Grolimund
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered December 11, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover over upon a judgment paid by plaintiff, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBausman, J.
The complaint against a husband and wife alleges merely that Mrs. Grolimund while married gave one Seeds her promissory note, that the latter transferred it before maturity to plaintiff and another who in turn sold it to one Wagner, and that Wagner reduced it to judgment against her and her immediate indorsers including plaintiff Balkema. The latter, having paid the judgment, now sues Mrs. Grolimund and her husband too for the amount of the note with costs and an attorney’s fee, which last' the note authorized but *327the judgment had not included. In this aggregate the court gave judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yesler v. HochstettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Heintz v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Main v. SchollWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Fielding v. KetlerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Jones, Rosquist, Killen Co. v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Lucci v. LucciWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Streck v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Wilbeck v. ConwayWashington Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.