Legal Opinion

Jones, Rosquist, Killen Co. v. Nelson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1917No. 14089PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered December 9, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action bn contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.

Plaintiff corporation brought this action against defendants, John Nelson and wife, to recover the purchase price of a piano, alleged to have been sold to them under the following contract:

“I, we and each of us promise to pay to the order of Jones, Rosquist & Killen, the sum of two hundred ($200) dollars, at their office in Seattle, Washington, as follows: $25.00 (twenty-five dollars) per month on the 5th day of each and every month thereafter until fully paid, commencing on the 5th day of May, 1916, with interest on the amount unpaid at the rate of eight per cent per annum, payable monthly.
“T…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. McCartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Van Lehn v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hector v. HectorWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. E. R. Butterworth & Sons v. TealeWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hyman v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kerr v. CochranWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Maxwell's Electric, Inc. v. Hegeman-Harris Co. of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Schrock v. GillinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Evans v. HartmannWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Streck v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API