Legal Opinion

Doe v. RD AND ED

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 6, 1992No. 23618PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The sole question we address on appeal is whether summary judgment was proper in an action by appellant, the son, against respondent, his parents, for injury arising from alleged sexual abuse which took place over twenty years ago. We affirm the Circuit Court’s granting of summary judgment to the parents.

FACTS

The son alleged in his complaint that between the years 1958 and 1968, he was sexually abused by his father with his mother’s knowledge. The son was between the ages of six and sixteen at the time of the alleged abuse. Thus, the son reached the age of majority in 1973. See…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Tyson v. TysonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ew v. DchMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. E.W. v. D.C.H.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Doe v. First United Methodist ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Jane Roe v. Jane Doe John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Farris v. ComptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API