Petersen v. Bruen
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*272OPINION
By the Court,
Steffen, J.:
The district court dismissed appellant Tor Petersen’s complaint on the ground that it was time-barred by the statute of limitations. Petersen, seeking damages for injuries resulting from child sexual abuse (CSA), contends that the lower court erred in refusing to apply the “discovery rule” to toll the running of the statutory period. Convinced that Petersen is entitled to maintain his action, we reverse.
Facts
Petersen was sexually abused by respondent, Ned Bruen, during the period from 1975 to 1983 when, under the auspices of the Big Brothers program, Bruen was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Deborah Fidler v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Tyson v. TysonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Susan Labram Bart Labram v. James HavelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.