Legal Opinion
E.W. v. D.C.H.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1988No. 87-470PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy
Plaintiffs appeal the memorandum and order of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, which found that plaintiffs’ claims were barred by the statute of limitations governing torts, Section 27-2-204, MCA. We affirm.
Plaintiffs present the following issues for review:
1. Was the statute of limitations tolled in this case of incest by the delayed-discovery rule?
2. Did the District Court correctly refuse to apply the fraudulent concealment doctrine?
3. Did the District Court correctly determine that there were no genuine issues of material fact?
The controversy at hand…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Tyson v. TysonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Johnson v. St. Patrick's HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1966
- Bennett v. Dow Chemical Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Doe v. First United Methodist ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Farris v. ComptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.