Case, Bishop & Co. v. D. M. Steele & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Jewell District Court. At tlie April Term, 1884, D. M. Steele & Co. recovered against Case, Bishop & Co. a judgment which they bring here for review. The opinion states the nature of the action, the pleadings, and the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
On August 19, 1881, Doty Bros. & Co. were hardware merchants doing business at Mankato, Jewell county, but were insolvent. Among their creditors were D. M. Steele & Co., and Case, Bishop & Co. On that day they executed to Case, Bishop & Co. a chattel mortgage on their entire ■stock of hardware. This was all the property they owned subject to the payment of debts, and they mortgaged the same to secure the sum of $2,500, which they owed to Case, Bishop & Co. The mortgage was duly filed in the office of the register of deeds, and Case,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Learned v. BryantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Sponenbarger v. LemertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Dorr v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Bleven v. FreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Adams v. FoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1845
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moffatt v. FoutsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Stevenson v. PalmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Woods-Egan Live-Stock Commission Co. v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. GoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Heilbrunn v. EllsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.