Legal Opinion

Cermak v. Schaaf

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1923No. 14765PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Defendant in error, for use of Seligsberg & Co., brought suit in the superior court of Cook county against the plaintiff in error and F. R. Schaaf on a forthcoming bond in the sum of $8000, with Schaaf as principal and plaintiff in error as surety. The bond was given to the bailiff of the municipal court of Chicago, to retain the custody of one automobile and four automobile tires, and was conditioned as follows: “The condition of this obligation is such, that whereas on the 7th day of August, A. D. 1918, a certain writ of attachment in aid issued out of the municipal court of Chicago at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Juilliard v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pierce v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Dorr v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Dehler v. HeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Bleven v. FreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deibler v. Bernard Bros., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Gould v. KlabundeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  3. Marchant v. Artists Embassy, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Hurt v. OhlmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Estrada v. Corte Municipal de CialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API