Legal Opinion
Wadena Implement Co. v. Deere & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 28, 1992No. C5-91-975, C7-91-1402PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant Deere & Co. challenges (1) the trial court’s finding that appellant violated the Minnesota Agricultural Equipment Dealership Act through improper termination of respondents’ dealership; (2) the court’s grant of a permanent injunction; and (3) the court’s award of attorney fees. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Wadena Implement Company (Wadena Implement) has been a farm equipment dealership for appellant Deere & Company (Deere) since 1959. Respondent Steven Nelson is the majority shareholder and vice president of Wadena Implement. Wadena Implement’s business…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- United States v. David White, Individually and Doing Business as Minnesota Society for Educated CitizensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Clay MendezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Kids'klub, Inc. v. State Dept. of Human Res.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Frank Martin Sons, Inc. v. John Deere Construction & Forestry Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.