Legal Opinion

Teddy W. Baker v. Gte North Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 2, 1997No. 96-2368, 96-3625PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

GTE North formerly required all of its “facility maintainers” (electricians who install and maintain telephone and transmission equipment, on customers’ premises or otherwise in the field) to report for duty at its local offices. There they received assignments for the day, hopped into company vehicles suitable to the job, and drove to the first place where they were to work that day. They were paid for the time it took to drive to that site and for the time driving back at day’s end. In 1991 GTE and the Communications Workers of America signed a collective…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Baker v. GTE North Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United Transportation Union Local 1745 v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Baker v. Barnard Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Bobo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Christopher Kieninger v. Crown Equipment CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API