Legal Opinion
Baker v. Barnard Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1998No. 96-2223PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
At issue in this case is whether return travel time associated with refueling and maintaining construction equipment qualifies as work under the Fair Labor Standards Act [FLSA], 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, and is therefore compensable under the FLSA. Plaintiffs, employees of Defendants Four-Way Company and Foutz & Bursum Construction Company, were hired to perform welding work on oil and gas pipelines. They brought this action against their employers, alleging violations of the FLSA’s overtime provisions.
As part of the terms of Plaintiffs’ employment, Defendants required…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Perez v. El Tequila, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Michael Ballaris v. Wacker Siltronic Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Lederman v. Frontier Fire Protection, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Brown v. ScriptPro, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.