Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Credenza
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
This is an action by the payee of a promissory note for $5000, dated February 3d, 1931, and payable four months after date, against the maker, Credenza, and an indorser before delivery, Champ. The trial court rendered judgment against both defendants, and the defendant Credenza alone appealed. The defense of the appellant is that his execution of the note, which he signed for the accommodation of the indorser, Champ, was procured by the misrepresentations of the latter and that the plaintiff did not take the paper in good faith and without notice of its infirmities, and was not therefore a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City National Bank of Auburn v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Rockville National Bank v. Citizens Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Moore v. Potomac Savings BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Alfred Williams & Co. v. WiltzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Standard Cement Co. v. Windham National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Funding Consultants, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Dinnis v. RobertsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Laurel Bank & Trust Co. v. Mark Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. JaroszewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.