Legal Opinion

Alfred Williams & Co. v. Wiltz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 6, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

Plaintiff’s cause of action is based upon a trade acceptance in the sum of $200, drawn by The Otis Oil Burner Corporation upon the defendant under date of September 1st, 1925, and accepted by him on that date, payable sixty days after date. It was transferred to the plaintiff by indorsement without recourse on September 12th, 1925. The answer alleges that the execution of the trade acceptance was procured by false and fraudulent representations made by The Otis Oil Burner Corporation in connection with a certain contract entered into between such corporation and the defendant, and that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Parsons v. Utica Cement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  3. Harris v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Funding Consultants, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Dooley v. Economy Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  3. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. CredenzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Coral Gables, Inc. v. HeimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Coral Gables, Inc. v. HeimConnecticut Superior Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API