Legal Opinion
Dinnis v. Roberts
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 26, 1994No. 12417PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) limited its consideration of the bad faith exception to the enforcement of the Home Improvement Act1 to a review of bad faith only in the inducement, and (2) concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact in dispute regarding the plaintiffs’ claim of bad faith on the part of the defendants in the performance, termination and repudiation of the home improvement contract. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fruin v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Honan v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- ANDY'S OIL SERVICE, INC. v. HobbsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Martinez v. Premier Maintenance, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Bishel v. Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.