Standard Cement Co. v. Windham National Bank
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Suit for an injunction and for an order requiring the defendants to interplead respecting their claims to the amount of a promissory note made by the plaintiff, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the court, Elmer, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the Utica Cement Manufacturing Company, and appeal by the Wind-ham National Bank for alleged errors in the rulings and findings of the court.
Read the full summary
Suit for an injunction and for an order requiring the defendants to interplead respecting their claims to the amount of a promissory note made by the plaintiff, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the court, Elmer, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the Utica Cement Manufacturing Company, and appeal by the Wind-ham National Bank for alleged errors in the rulings and findings of the court. The note in question was as follows:— “ 11,660. Hartford, Ct., Oct. 20,1887. “ Four months after date we promise to pay to the order of Utica Cement Manufacturing Co.,…
1Opinion of the CourtHamersley, J.
The first three assignments of error relate to the admission of testimony.
The admission of the testimony of Burton S. Hills is error. The recital by the judge in the finding of the existing conditions which determined its admissibility, is incomplete, but the record contains a full statement of those conditions, certified by the judge, and the recital in the finding may be read in the light of this statement. Thresher v. Dyer, 69 Conn. *680404, 409; Hoadley v. Savings Bank of Danbury, 71 Conn. 599, 612. So read, it appears that the testimony of Hills was admitted upon the statement of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Nolan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Thresher v. DyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Credit Co. v. Howe Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Hall v. HaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. CredenzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Garris v. CalechmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Hemingway v. CozzolinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Goodhart v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Sample v. Hundred Lakes Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932