Legal Opinion

Merlo v. Zoning Comm'n of Wethersfield

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 1, 1984No. (2403)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

This case raises the narrow issue of whether the defendant planning and zoning commission’s failure to approve a subdivision plan with certain stipulations it had proposed constituted a disapproval of the plan under General Statutes § 8-26 1 so as to avoid an automatic approval as a result of the passing of the sixty-five day deadline for a decision pursuant to General Statutes § 8-26d. 2

The plaintiff, claiming such statutory approval of its subdivision application, sought mandamus to compel the issuance of the permit. The trial court denied the request for a writ of mandamus and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Milford Education Assn. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Lupinacci v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Merlo v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Trivalent Realty Co. v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. Beninato v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Merlo v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API