Legal Opinion
Lupinacci v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 25, 1966PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
Two appeals by the plaintiffs have been combined for hearing in this court in accordance with § 606 of the Practice Book. Both arise from efforts of the plaintiffs to obtain a change in the zonal classification of a portion of their property in Darien from a residence R-% zone to a planned retail business zone. They attempted to accomplish this change by separate simultaneous applications to the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of Darien, hereinafter referred to as the commission. One was an application to amend the plan of development to include the proposed change in zone; the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- STATE BAR ASSN. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Grievance Committee v. RottnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Gordon v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Stiles v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Kyser v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Kleinsmith v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.