Legal Opinion
Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 30, 1997No. 95-153CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
In this action for breach of contract and taking of property without just compensation, plaintiff Alaska Pulp Corporation’s (“APC”) fifth claim for relief requests that this Court determine the parties’ rights under a land patent. Pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1), Defendant requests that this Court dismiss the fifth claim of APC’s first amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant contends that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over APC’s fifth claim because that claim is not governed by the Contract Disputes Act (CDA). Moreover, defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- The Sharman Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vanalco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Medina Construction, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Blinderman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- CPS Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.