Legal Opinion
Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 28, 2004No. 95-153CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
In this decision, we address Plaintiffs claim for damages for breach of contract. On February 14, 2001, we entered summary *402judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on liability on Count One of the Complaint, having ruled that the U.S. Forest Service breached a 50-year contract with the Alaska Pulp Corporation (APC) when it implemented three provisions of the Tongass Timber Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 101-626, 104 Stat. 4926 (1990) (TTRA). Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United States, 48 Fed.Cl. 655 (2001).
In its diligent efforts to establish damages resulting from this breach, APC presented…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- John Cucuras and Maria Cucuras, Parents and Next Friends of Nicole Cucuras v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shapiro v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ashbritt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Passamaquoddy Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.