Salt Lake City Corp. v. Haik
Court of Appeals of Utah
Judge Kate Appleby authored this Opinion, in which Judges Michele M. Christiansen Forster and Diana Hagen concurred.
1Opinion of the Court
APPLEBY, Judge:
¶1 Salt Lake City Corporation (SLC) and the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy (the District) filed a claim seeking a declaratory judgment as to the nature, validity, and priority of water rights claimed by Mark C. Haik (Haik) and Pearl Raty (Raty). Raty filed various counterclaims seeking to compel SLC to supply water to her lot in the Albion Basin Subdivision in Little Cottonwood Canyon. Haik and Raty appeal the district court's grant of partial summary judgment to SLC and the District on their declaratory judgment claim. Raty appeals the district court's…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Jenkins v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Bank of America v. AdamsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Society of Professional Journalists v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Green River Canal Co. v. ThaynUtah Supreme Court · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moulding Investments v. Box Elder CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. HaikUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Allen Family Trust v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Boldt v. American Fork CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Friends of Great Salt Lake v. UDEQCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023