Legal Opinion

Rocky Ford Irr. Co. v. Kents Lake Reservoir Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1943No. 6473PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

In April, 1938, the defendant Kents Lake Reservoir Company filed with the defendant State Engineer an application to change the place of storage of 830 acre feet of water per annum out of a previously awarded storage right of 1,660 acre feet from the South Fork of Beaver River to a proposed reservoir site on the main channel of Beaver River commonly called “Three Creeks.” Another application was filed by Kents Lake in March, 1940, with the State Engineer to appropriate for annual storage from Beaver River 1,193 acre feet of water alleged to be unappropriated, the same to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Morris v. BeanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1906
  3. In Re Waters of Manse SpringNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Eardley v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In Re Birdwood Irr. Dist., Water Division No. 1-ANebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Lehi Irr. Co. v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Eskelsen v. Town of PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API