Legal Opinion

Sejnoha v. City of Yankton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice

[¶ 1.] Joe and Jim Sejnoha (Sejnohas) purchased real estate from Yankton County (County) at a tax sale. At the auction, they were informed that the City of Yank-ton (City) claimed special assessments against a number of lots, including those lots purchased by Sejnohas. After negotiating with City, Sejnohas paid the assessments. Subsequent to that payment, in a separate lawsuit, this Court held that City’s assessments did not survive County’s tax sale. Sejnohas sued City to recover the payments made under the settlement. The trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of City. Sejnoha’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. High Plains Genetics Research, Inc. v. J K Mill-Iron RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mattson v. RachettoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Estes v. MilleaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Icehouse, Inc. v. GeisslerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stabler v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Arnoldy v. Mahoney & FinnemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. HARDING COUNTY, SD v. FrithiofCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. McDowell v. CITICORP INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API