Legal Opinion
Icehouse, Inc. v. Geissler
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 7, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] The Icehouse, Inc. (“Icehouse”) leased portions of a building owned by Paul Geissler and PTG Enterprises, LLC (collectively referred to as “Geissler”). The applicable leases extended through March 5, 2001, with an option to renew for another five-year term held by Icehouse. After a dispute arose as to the parties’ rights under the leases, Icehouse filed a declaratory judgment action. .Geissler filed a counterclaim, alleging numerous material breaches of the leases, and requesting immediate eviction. The circuit court concluded one lease was ambiguous and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bridgestone/firestone, Inc. v. Recovery Credit Services, Inc., Revenue Recovery, Inc. And George BeladinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. SchillingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Pesicka v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Jacobson v. GulbransenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
- Weitzel v. Sioux Valley Heart PartnersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- KRANTZ, INC. v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2005
- A-G-E Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Tri-City Assocsiates, LP v. Belmont, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.