Legal Opinion
McDowell v. CITICORP INC.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 2008No. 24657PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Pamela McDowell appeals the circuit court’s denial of her motion to amend her complaint to include pre-bankruptcy causes of action. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶2.] This case begins in a workers’ compensation case originating in December of 1991. As a result of her injury, McDowell entered into a settlement agreement with her employer’s insurance adjustment firm, Crawford & Company (Crawford), who administered workers’ compensation claims on behalf of her employer, Citibank/Citicorp (Citicorp). 1 McDowell also brought a lawsuit alleging Citicorp had unreasonably delayed payments of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Union Planters National Leasing, Inc. v. Roderick D. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Carolyn Graham, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terance Anthony Graham v. County of WashtenawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Dorn v. The State Bank Of StellaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zhi Gang Zhang v. RasmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Robinson-Podoll v. Harmelink, Fox, & Ravnsborg Law OfficeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Ries v. Jm Custom Homes, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Zhang v. RasmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019