Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county, Sheeks, J., entered April 20, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action upon a fire insurance policy, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought to recover $393.45 on a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant. Upon a trial of the case, the court made findings and entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.
The facts are not disputed. They were found by the trial court substantially as follows: In March, 1916, the appellant issued to the respondent its policy of insurance insuring certain properties against fire as follows, to wit:
One two-story frame patent roof mill building and additions in the sum of $1,978; engines in the sum of $226; boilers and connections in the sum of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. BlumenthalWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Pederson v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Addison Miller, Inc. v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Hamilton County Mutual Fire Ins. v. RosenbaumOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
- Detroit Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. CrayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937