Legal Opinion

Hamilton County Mutual Fire Ins. v. Rosenbaum

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The action below was brought by the defendant in error, Solomon Rosenbaum, against the plaintiff in error, to recover a balance due under a policy of fire insurance issued on the property of Rosenbaum.

The fire occurred in the Rosenbaum property, and both the insurance company and the insured investigated the damages to the property and submitted the estimated cost of repairs. Negotiations were carried on between the insurer and the insured, looking to a settlement of the damage, and from those negotiations there resulted the payment of the sum of $475 to the insured by the insurer. This sum…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Larkin v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Palatine Insurance v. NunnMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Dinneen v. American InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Carpenter v. Liberty Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API