Pederson v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered May 27, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought to recover an alleged balance of $33,813.65 as extras upon a contract with” the city of Tacoma for the construction of the Nisqually electric power plant for the city. The answer of the city denied that there was any amount due from the city to the plaintiff, and alleged an accord and satisfaction entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant prior to the bringing of the action. The case was tried to the court without a jury. At the conclusion thereof, the court found that there had been an accord and satisfaction of the plaintiff’s claims, and for that reason…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Green v. FullerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Clubb v. Sentinel Life Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
- Green v. FullerWashington Supreme Court · 1930