Legal Opinion · Dissent
Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1937No. 26340. En BancPublished
1DissentTolman, J.
(dissenting) — In my judgment, this case cannot be distinguished from the case of Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 106 Wash. 309, 179 Pac. 799; and since I am unwilling to overrule that case, I am disposed to affirm the judgment in this case.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1919