Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1937No. 26340. En BancPublished

1DissentTolman, J.

(dissenting) — In my judgment, this case cannot be distinguished from the case of Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 106 Wash. 309, 179 Pac. 799; and since I am unwilling to overrule that case, I am disposed to affirm the judgment in this case.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1919