Legal Opinion
Rosier v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 24, 2011No. Civil Action No. 10-cv-525 (RLW)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Petunia Rosier brings this action for race and disability discrimination pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and, presumably, the Rehabilitation Act. 29 U.S.C. § 791(b).1 Presently before the Court is “Defendant’s Motion For Partial Dismissal.” (Doc. 5.) To the extent Rosier asserts a claim for constructive discharge, Defendant contends the claim should be dismissed, pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. For the reasons spelled out below, the Court will grant.the motion, in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Vasser v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mahoney v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Latson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.