Legal Opinion

Williams v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 8, 1983No. 82-180PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although several issues are presented for review, the issue which is dispositive of this appeal involves the question of whether a security agreement can be modified either orally or by waiver if the security agreement requires that all modifications be in writing. The directed verdict of the trial court is affirmed.

On November 1, 1976, Curtis Williams, plaintiff-appellant, entered into a contract to purchase a 1974 Oldsmobile from Joe Meyers Ford in Houston, Texas. The contract was financed through Ford Motor Credit Company (FMCC), the defendant-appellee. Thirty payments of $136.40 were to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herston v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Hale v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. McAllister v. Langford Investigators, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Scocca v. WiltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. McGrady v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  3. Pavco Industries, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Bayles v. Southern Guar. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Johnson v. Central Bank of the SouthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API