Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Central Bank of the South

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 25, 1987No. 85-1504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David E. Johnson appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Central Bank of the South on his claim alleging conversion, wrongful repossession, wrongful detention, and misrepresentation.

On January 27, 1984, Johnson executed a note and a security agreement for $16,300 to Central Bank for the purchase of an automobile. In May 1985, Johnson defaulted on the note and Central Bank repossessed the automobile.

The note/security agreement contained a repossession clause that gave Central Bank the right to repossess without notice to the debtor. The agreement also contained both a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. McAllister v. Langford Investigators, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Williams v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Kessel v. Western Savings Credit UnionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Williamson v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ruffin v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API