McAllister v. Langford Investigators, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff sued the defendant for wrongfully taking the plaintiff's car. Additionally, the plaintiff alleged in her complaint that defendant had committed a trespass in taking the car.
At the close of the plaintiff's case before a jury, the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The learned trial judge granted the defendant's motion for a directed verdict and the plaintiff appeals.
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the directed verdict in favor of defendant. We find no such error and affirm.
At the outset, we note two general principles of law…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ott v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Chandler v. HunterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Coburn v. American Liberty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Hale v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Bank of Huntsville v. WitcherCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Van Bibber v. NorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Battista v. Savings Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Williams v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Johnson v. Central Bank of the SouthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.