McGrady v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court are two separate motions for summary judgment. First, Defendants Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (“Nissan”) filed its Motion For Summary Judgment on July 31, 1998, along with an accompanying, brief in sup port of its motion (“Nissan’s Br.”) and an evidentiary appendix for the brief. On August 18, 1998, Plaintiff Dianne L. MeGrady (“Plaintiff’)' filed her Brief In Response to Nissan’s motion for summary judgment (“Pl.’s Nissan Resp.”), to which Nissan filed a reply (“Nissan’s Reply”) and an accompanying evidentiary…