Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 23, 1978No. 33331PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Chief Justice.

This is the second appearance of this case before this court. In its first appearance, this court granted certiorari and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of this court’s holding in Fulton Nat. Bank v. Horn, 239 Ga. 648 (238 SE2d 358) (1977).

On remand, the Court of Appeals (144 Ga. App. 281 (241 SE2d 9) (1977)) concluded that this case fell under the rationale of Lee v. O’Quinn, 184 Ga. 44 (190 SE 564) (1937), rather than Horn, "since the declaration-of-acceleration clause here does not provide that the creditor may declare…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lee v. O'QuinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Fulton National Bank v. HornSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Fleet Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1993
  2. Jack Grant, Jr., Evelyn H. Grant, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. General Electric Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Low Cost Cars, Inc. v. MunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Williams v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Reis v. RallsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API