Legal Opinion

O'Boskey v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1984No. 14373PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

The district court, the Honorable Gerald F. Schroeder, granted summary judgment in favor of the O’Boskeys based on a holding that a deed of trust executed by them in favor of First Federal Savings and Loan which contained a due-on-sale clause could not be enforced absent a showing of impairment of the security. We first note that we recently affirmed Judge Schroeder’s holding that under Idaho law a due-on-sale clause in a deed of trust is not an unreasonable restraint on the alienation of property and is enforceable according to its terms and conditions. See Lake v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Lake v. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'Boskey v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bruno v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bruno v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bruno v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bruno v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API