Legal Opinion

Bruno v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1989No. 16714Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

The Appellants having filed a PETITION FOR REHEARING on February 9, 1989, and supporting BRIEF on February 23, 1989, of the Court’s Opinion entered January 19, 1989, 115 Idaho 1104, 772 P.2d 1198; therefore, after due consideration,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s PETITION FOR REHEARING be, and hereby is, DENIED and the dissent on Denial of the Petition for Rehearing by BISTLINE, J., be, and hereby is, RELEASED.

2DissentBistline, Justice

The rules of this Court require two votes for the granting of a petition for rehearing. As I have on many occasions said as to obtaining the…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bellingham First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Funk v. FunkIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lake v. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API