Bruno v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
The Appellants having filed a PETITION FOR REHEARING on February 9, 1989, and supporting BRIEF on February 23, 1989, of the Court’s Opinion entered January 19, 1989, 115 Idaho 1104, 772 P.2d 1198; therefore, after due consideration,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s PETITION FOR REHEARING be, and hereby is, DENIED and the dissent on Denial of the Petition for Rehearing by BISTLINE, J., be, and hereby is, RELEASED.
2DissentBistline, Justice
The rules of this Court require two votes for the granting of a petition for rehearing. As I have on many occasions said as to obtaining the…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bellingham First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Funk v. FunkIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Lake v. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.