Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bruno v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1989No. 16714Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

Were one in a mood for philosophizing, here is a case where one might easily come up with the novel ideal of occasionally submitting it to a .given law school class. Discussions of the law of novation will certainly take place there more often than in the Supreme Court. Other than for participating in Harris v. Wildcat Corp., 97 Idaho 884, 556 P.2d 67 (1976), where Justice Shepard defined the law in this area, my previous exposure to it was at the College of Law at the University of Idaho.

PART I

The Court’s majority opinion for the main part simply is an adoption of the *1110district court’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bellingham First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fairchild v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Funk v. FunkIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Allen Steel Supply Co. v. BradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Davenport v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API