Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bruno v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1989No. 16714Published

1ConcurrenceBakes, Justice

I concur in the majority opinion which affirms the trial court’s decision that the Brunos in this case have no cause of action against First Federal. At first glance this case looks similar to our recent case of O’Boskey v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 106 Idaho 339, 678 P.2d 1112 (1984). The note and deed of trust involved in this case is the same as that involved in O’Boskey. However, the circumstances are different.

In O’Boskey, the owner of the land in question, O’Boskey, entered into a sale agreement with one Kemp who, pursuant to the sale agreement, assumed the obligation under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake v. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. O'Boskey v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API