Legal Opinion

Holt v. Gambill

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 14, 2004No. 21329-3-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

98 P.3d 1254 (2004)

David HOLT d/b/a Holt Roofing, Respondent,

v.

Charles GAMBILL and Diane Gambill, husband and wife, d/b/a Management Company; and Global Fitness, a corporation, Appellants,

Debbie A. Cornwell and John Doe Cornwell, wife and husband; Cumberland Casualty Surety Co., Defendants.

No. 21329-3-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Seven.

October 14, 2004.

Steven Schneider, Murphy, Bantz & Bury PS, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Robert Drummond, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

SCHULTHEIS, J.

Under the Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR), a party to a mandatory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Carpenter v. ElwayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Simmerly v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ochoa AG Unlimited, L.L.C. v. DelanoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Amanda Butler, V. James FinneranCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  3. SPLATTSTOESSER v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Splattstoesser v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API