Splattstoesser v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Korsmo, A.C.J.
¶1 — This court granted discretionary review to determine if misnaming the sole “aggrieved party” voids a request for a trial de novo. We agree with the trial court that amendments to the Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR) do not require that result and affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Petitioner Candace Splattstoesser was stopped in her car at a red light when a car driven by respondent Kenneth *334Scott struck her from behind. Ms. Splattstoesser subsequently filed suit against Mr. Scott. His answer admitted the collision but denied that he had been negligent.
¶3 The parties agreed to submit the case…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.