Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Elway

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 19, 1999No. 22964-1-II, 23258-8-II, 24746-1-II, 23408-4-IIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

These four consolidated cases involve application of Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR) 6.2, 6.3 and 7.1(a), which set forth procedures for filing an arbitration award, seeking a trial de novo, and entering or vacating judgment on an award. Specifically, we consider the consequences of filing a request for a trial de novo before the arbitrator has filed proof of service of the arbitration award, what constitutes sufficient proof of service, and the minimum requirements for appealing a judgment on an arbitration award.

We hold that a request for a trial de novo is premature if filed before the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Manius v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Manius v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Sunderland v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API