Legal Opinion

Ochoa AG Unlimited, L.L.C. v. Delanoy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 21, 2005No. 23101-1-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 The question presented is whether seed potatoes are seeds or planting stock under Washington’s statutory scheme. The distinction is important because Washington’s agricultural statutes require mandatory arbitration of disputes over seed — but not planting stock — transactions. We agree with the trial judge that seed potatoes are planting stock and, therefore, that the buyer could sue the seller here for damages without first submitting the claim to arbitration.

Sweeney, A.C.J.

FACTS

¶2 William “Bill” Delanoy does business in Washington as Prairieview Seed Potato. Prairieview sold seed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Pleas v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Weyerhaeuser v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Weyerhaeuser v. TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY HEALTHCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teamsters Local 839 v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API