Legal Opinion
Dover v. Archambeault
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1922No. Civ. No. 3886PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Action to recover damages incurred by reason of negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile, whereby the defendant’s automobile collided with another automobile in which the plaintiff Margaret Dover was riding, and whereby personal injuries were received by her. The accident occurred May 9, 1920. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendant appeals therefrom.
At the time of the accident Mrs. Dover was riding in .. a Ford automobile owned and driven by one H. A. Palmaymesa. She was riding, with three other persons, as a guest of Palmaymesa, and they were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tousley v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Spear v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Mathes v. Aggeler & Musser Seed Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Hall v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Kenny v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Campagna v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Alexander v. HammarbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.