Legal Opinion

Hall v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1922No. S. F. No. 9911PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

These two eases were consolidated and tried together in the superior court. They were transferred to the district court of appeal and an opinion was rendered by that court affirming the judgment. The facts and the question in issue were correctly stated in that opinion as follows:

“The plaintiffs were injured in a collision between the automobile in which they were riding and a street-car which was being operated by an agent of the defendant and they sued the defendant to recover damages. The judgment went for the plaintiffs and the defendant has appealed. In its briefs the defendant earnestly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arnold v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Francis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Dover v. ArchambeaultCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Carey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Daniel v. AsbillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API