Mathes v. Aggeler & Musser Seed Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants, the plaintiff recovered judgment and the defendants appeal.
The points urged in support of the appeal have no merit and require little discussion.
The allegation of the complaint charging negligence stated that at a time and place described, the two defendants, each driving an automobile, “so negligently operated their respect tive automobiles that the same collided one with the other, forcing the automobile of the defendant, Euth Purcell, violently over against the plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Hoffman v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Malone v. ClemowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Skaggs v. WileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Noble v. Key System, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.