Legal Opinion

Tustin Plaza Partnership v. Wehage

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1994No. G013806PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

Tustin Plaza Partnership contends the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing its lawsuit for failure to bring the action *1561to trial within three years after its commencement. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.410 et seq.)1 We affirm.

Ken and Elizabeth Wehage (Wehage) entered into a 10-year lease with Tustin’s predecessor in interest for the rental of commercial property. Two years later, on December 30, 1988, Tustin commenced the underlying action alleging Wehage’s breach, but it waited two years and eleven months to serve the complaint. Wehage answered promptly and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Billings v. Health Plan of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Peltier v. McCloud River RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Panzino v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Castro v. Sacramento County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API