Legal Opinion

Schram v. Cotton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

Acting under authority conferred upon him by act of Congress, the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States, on May 16, 1933, “ found and declared ” that it appeared to his satisfaction that, in order to pay the contracts, debts and engagements of First National Bank-Detroit, it was necessary to enforce the individual liability of the stockholders of such bank as prescribed in the Revised Statutes of the United States (§§ 5151, 5234). Accordingly, he levied an assessment and requisition upon the stockholders of First National Bank-Detroit for twenty-five million dollars to be paid by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Pufahl v. Estate of ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Simons v. GroesbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Schram v. KeaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Downey v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. Schram v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. Rapp v. CansdaleNew York Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API