Schram v. Robertson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing appellant’s bill with prejudice and denying appellant’s motion for leave to file a supplemental bill. The dismissal was granted upon the ground that appellant’s cause of action was barred by a California statute of limitations. Appellant, hereinafter called Schram, as the receiver of the First National Bank-Detroit, hereinafter called First National, is suing appellee as stockholder in Detroit Bankers Company, a Michigan corporation, hereinafter called Bankers Company, for an assessment levied upon the stock of the First…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Pufahl v. Estate of ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Beeson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- McIntyre v. Michigan State InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Alaska Credit Bureau v. FennerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1948
- Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. DolingerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.