Legal Opinion

Simons v. Groesbeck

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket Nos. 137, 138, Calendar Nos. 37,970, 37,971PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

These suits involving substantially the same questions will be disposed of together. In one, plaintiffs, owners of the common stock of the Detroit Bankers Company, a corporation organized under Act No. 84, Pub. Acts 1921, filed their bill of complaint against William P. Connolly, receiver of the Detroit Bankers Company, alleging they are owners of the stock in the Detroit Bankers Company. The certificates of stock held by plaintiffs recite:

‘ ‘ This certificate and the' shares of stock represented thereby, and the rights of the owner thereof, are subject to the provisions of those parts of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crawford v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Winans v. WilkieMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Huxtable v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Terry v. Durand Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Barbour v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  2. In Re Burger's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Fors v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bicknell v. GarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Schram v. KeaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API