Legal Opinion

Gassman v. Dorius

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1975No. 13849PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a judgment in favor of Respondent declaring that under the facts adduced, Gassman had not violated the provisions of Title 41-6-44.10 (a) of the Motor Vehicle Act, Utah Code Annotated 1953. Affirmed.

Believable admissible evidence favorable to the decision, which the lower court appears to have indulged, briefly may be stated as follows:

Respondent was stopped by a peace officer about 12:45 a. m. after the former had made an unlawful right turn onto a highway that at the. time carried very little traffic. The officer detected an odor of alcohol and gave…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ringwood v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hunter v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Gibb v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bean v. State, Department of Public Safety, Drivers' License DivisionUtah Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beck v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Elliott v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Salt Lake City v. WomackUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Peterson v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Powell v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API